Home » News » What is Organizational Climate and What Are the Best Research Practices to Manage It?

What is Organizational Climate and What Are the Best Research Practices to Manage It?

Carrying out an efficient organizational climate survey requires a structured and strategic process.

Below, we highlight some of the best practices recommended by Koru’s Engagement Manager, Julia Longo, to ensure that results translate into real improvements within the company.

1. Strategic Planning

To obtain relevant data, it is essential to define clear objectives: what do you want to measure? Culture, well-being, inclusion or leadership?

Furthermore, having the support of senior leadership ensures that the results are not just a survey of opinions, but rather an input for strategic decisions.

It is also important to choose the best frequency: annual surveys can be complemented by shorter and more frequent pulse surveys for continuous monitoring.

The CEO of Koru Business School, Daniel Spolaor, also highlights: “Ideally, all climate research should be customized for your company. Off-the-shelf research has an effect on employee branding, but loses the effectiveness of actually addressing priority organizational aspects.”

2. Construction of the Questionnaire

Questions should be written according to some basic principles. Direct and objective questions avoid confusion and increase the response rate.

Mixing quantitative and qualitative questions provides a specific database by industry  balance between objective metrics and deeper insights.

It is also essential to use consistent scales, such as 1 to 5 or 0 to 10, to facilitate data analysis and maintain participant anonymity, ensuring more sincere responses.

3. Application of Research

Properly publicizing the survey increases employee engagement. Clearly explaining the importance of the initiative and how the data will be used is essential.

It is important to ensure accessibility, allowing the survey to be answered in different formats, such as mobile, computer and, if necessary, printed. The response time should be well planned, with deadlines between 7 and 14 days to balance urgency and availability.

4. Data Analysis and Interpretation

After collection, data should be analyzed to identify patterns and trends, comparing results with previous editions of the survey.

Segmentation by areas within the organization is also recommended, as it allows us to understand variations and specific challenges in each sector.

The focus should be on actionable insights: what real changes can be implemented based on the results?

5. Communication of Results

Transparency in communication is essential for employees to feel that their opinions have been taken into account.

Results can be shared through different formats, such as presentations, infographics and internal reports.

However, it is essential to avoid exposing specific groups, taiwan data  especially when the number of responses is small, to preserve confidentiality and avoid possible discomfort.

6. Action and Monitoring

Research only has a real impact when its results translate into concrete changes. Creating an action plan based on the feedback collected is essential to demonstrate commitment to improving the organizational environment.

Involving employees in the development of solutions also strengthens engagement. In addition, monitoring changes and conducting new surveys to assess progress is essential for continuous adjustments.

Common Mistakes in Organizational Climate Management

Managing the organizational climate effectively is the goal, but some flaws are often observed in companies:

  • Not measuring climate regularly: Ignoring the need for surveys or other assessment methods prevents the identification of problems and understanding employee perceptions.
  • Not communicating results: Conducting research and not sharing the findings with employees creates distrust and the feeling that their opinions don’t matter.
  • Not creating action plans: Identifying problems without implementing concrete actions to solve them makes measurement a useless exercise.
  • Superficial or generic actions: Implementing standardized solutions without considering the root causes of the problems identified in the climate.
  • Blaming employees: Interpreting a negative climate as “whining” or a lack of individual engagement, instead of analyzing the flaws in processes and management.
  • Focusing only on the negative aspects: Ignoring the positive aspects of the climate and not reinforcing them can be demotivating and give an incomplete image.
  • Not involving leadership: A lack of leadership commitment and participation makes any climate improvement initiative ineffective.
  • Believing in quick solutions: Improving the organizational climate is an ongoing process that requires time, consistency and monitoring.
  • Not integrating climate into strategy: Treating climate as something isolated, without linking it to business objectives and the company’s culture.
  • Lack of monitoring: Not monitoring the impact  inbound marketing and b2b strategies, hand in hand of the actions implemented and not taking new measurements to check the evolution of the climate.

Success Stories: Companies that Transformed the Climate and Reaped Results

Many companies around the world have recognized the importance of a positive organizational climate and have invested in its transformation, reaping significant results in several areas. Below, we present some notable examples:

1. Google

Widely recognized for its innovative organizational climate focused on employee well-being, Google offers a flexible work environment, leisure spaces, development programs and a culture that values ​​creativity and open communication.

This approach contributes to high levels of satisfaction, engagement and, consequently, to the company’s innovation and success.

Results: Consistently ranked among the best companies to work for, with high talent retention and strong attraction of new professionals. Its innovative culture drives the creation of revolutionary products.

2. Netflix

The streaming giant has built an organizational culture based on freedom and responsibility, encouraging employee autonomy and valuing innovation.

The policy of constant feedback and transparency in decisions contribute to a work environment where talents feel valued and engaged.

Results: Leadership in the streaming market, high capacity for innovation and attraction of high-level professionals.

3. Nature

The Brazilian cosmetics company has employee well-being as one of its pillars, reflected in the motto “well-being well”.

Natura invests in quality of life programs, personal and professional development, and promotes an inclusive and collaborative work environment.

Results: Strong reputation as an employer, high employee satisfaction rates and a culture that values ​​people first.

The Role of HR and Leadership in Building a Positive Climate

The data shows that organizational climate surveys are already part of companies’ routine, but there are three major opportunities for evolution:

  • Increase survey frequency to capture real-time changes and act faster;
  • Strengthen impact measurement by creating clear KPIs to assess the success of results-based initiatives;
  • Transform discussions into concrete actions, ensuring that senior leadership is committed to implementing suggested improvements.

With these adjustments, HR can become even more strategic and effective in building healthy and productive work environments.

For companies that want to accelerate this journey and implement more effective climate surveys, having training such as Koru’s Strategic HR Immersion can make a difference.

By adopting customized solutions and structured monitoring, HR can expand its impact and strengthen organizational culture in a consistent manner.

Scroll to Top